AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070: If you could buy one, which should it be? | PC Gamer - christieplethell

1. Rest home
2. Features

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070: If you could buy one, which should it be?

(Image credit: Future)

The graphics carte marketplace is beginning to fill out following the first roll of Nvidia's Ampere and AMD's RDNA 2 architectures. The modish to join the ranks is AMD's Radeon RX 6700 XT, which you can record about finished in our Radeon RX 6700 XT review. Nearly of what I'm talking just about therein article is really coming from there through with the power of paraphrasing anyways, but I loved to give a quick and easy answer to the most pressing enquiry facing a prospective Microcomputer gamer with $500 to spend: Should I buy an AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT or an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070?

Both cards have an MSRP under $500, the RX 6700 XT arrives at $479 and the RTX 3070 a bit more at $499, but to quote my grannie: 'chance would be a fine affair'. So, we're all snapping up some opportunity to pick up a artwork card, none questions asked, due to the rarity of pel-pushing silicon.

Thus I'll get this out of the way early: If you're in the market and lucky enough to spot a Radeon RX 6700 XT available to purchase you should absolutely run low for it. It's a in truth solid performer and its generous 12GB GDDR6 VRAM bequeath see you jubilantly play for geezerhood to come. It's worth taking a punt at launch, at least, if alone because the launch windowpane is your best chance of finding this card listed at MSRP.

If you're recital long after the RX 6700 XT launch, when all illusion of MSRP is out of the window and you're unsure which graphics card you should commit clip to chasing refine, let's get into the price and performance to see where your money is best spent.

There are third-party options available for both of these card game, and that'll see the price disparity between the two entirely close up model-to-framework. It's nominally $20 'tween the MSRP of the two but if you'ray prepared to spend $500 along a graphics card, or near plenty, I'm passing to guess that another $20 English hawthorn non equal a deal-breaker for you anyways. So let's say the price ISN't a huge factor when determinant between these cardinal.

(Mental image credit: Future)

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT vs. Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 specs

	RX 6700 XT	RTX 3070
GPU	Navi 22	GA104
Architecture	RDNA 2	Ampere
Lithography	TSMC 7nm	Samsung 8nm
Boost clock	2,581MHz	1,725MHz
Retention capacity	12GB GDDR6	8GB GDDR6
Memory coach	192-scra	256-chip
TGP	230W	220W
Price	$479	$499

Thusly ultimately it comes down to a query of performance (when does IT not). I've picked out a few key battlegrounds to highlight where these card game roughly line up crossways 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. You can check out even Sir Thomas More comparisons in the aforementioned review, but you should be able to musical composition together a hot idea of what to expect Here.

F1 2020

Image 1 of 3

(Image credit: Tense)

Image 2 of 3

(Image accredit: Future)

Ikon 3 of 3

(Image credit entry: Future)

Total War: Ternary Kingdoms

Prototype 1 of 3

(Image credit: Future)

Image 2 of 3

(Image acknowledgment: Time to come)

Image 3 of 3

(Image acknowledgment: Future)

Shade of the Tomb Raider

Image 1 of 3

(Double citation: Future)

Image 2 of 3

(Image credit: Future)

Image 3 of 3

(Paradigm quotation: Prospective)

As you can see in the graphs above, the RTX 3070 is the faster of the two cards by some margin. The Radeon manages to keep blistery on the RTX 3070's tail for the fitter component part of 1080p, and even jump past IT in the more than plausive F1 2020, yet as presently as you creep up to 1440p and 4K the gap between the two grows. The GeForce is out in the lead by some 15 percent in a a couple of games.

It's worth considering a couple of another factors when it comes to operation. The first one—the impact of which will diverge on your visual communication preferences and selection of game—is when considering proper-time ray tracing workloads Nvidia's finessed radiate tracing solution actually proves itself even out much capable than AMD's. Nvidia's Deep Learning Comprehensive Sampling (DLSS) is some other victory for the green team up Hera too, as while AMD has its library of FidelityFX features, much As Content Adaptive Sharpening, DLSS is widely based on and able to significantly improve framerates for a rather minimal red in fidelity (depending along the game at hand).

Image 1 of 2

(Image credit: Futurity)

Image 2 of 2

(Effigy credit: Future)

There's something on the way from AMD in this department, though, a true competitor to DLSS. The company has promised information technology bequeath arrive this class, 2021, it's just not ready yet. So if you opt for the red team card, you will find some improvements in what AMD calls FidelityFX Super Resolution, we just don't get laid when Oregon to what extent.

What AMD has in its quiver that Nvidia does not at this damage is 12GB of GDDR6 memory. That's what you'll find on the Radeon RX 6700 XT, while the RTX 3070 has only 8GB of VRAM.

This is a bit of a sticking target. While we can't say what a 6GB RX 6700 XT may do like, we're certainly non seeing that 12GB of memory be some wizard salve for 1440p and 4K performance. It bequeath sure enough help to some level only how much, we don't know. What it might be important for, though, is the future of gaming. Yes, that ephemeral promise of future-proofing and planning for games that get not yet been announced. You've got to love information technology.

The 12GB of VRAM along the RX 6700 XT is certainly a more comfortable bet for the next few geezerhood of gaming than the 8GB found on the RTX 3070. Although IT relies along accessing that larger stash of memory via a smaller 192-routine bus and a new feature with RDNA 2 called Infinity Hive up. Meanwhile, the RTX 3070 sticks to a Sir Thomas More traditional, larger 256-bit bus. I won't dive into the specifics of all of this (once again, all in the review) but fair do it it's not quite a cut-and-dry case.

More memory is welcome, however, so the RX 6700 XT takes the win.

A look at the features along declare oneself with either add-in and it's safe to say that both Nvidia and AMD offer a mass with their software. AMD's Adrenalin Software is all-embracing and its latest overhaul has more of that at your fingertips than always. I'm currently using an AMD card in my personal PC and the Instant GIF functionality collective-in to the AMD software has made sharing throwaway play clips a breeze.

(Figure of speech credit: Hereafter)

On the other hand, Nvidia has kitted away its GeForce Have software package bundle over the years, what with ShadowPlay and all that. It recently added a few new features, too, such as Transmit, a collection of tools useful for beaming your voice and chee onto the internet.

It's a pretty handy tool, especially if you discover yourself gaming in vocal spaces or just have an overly eager to William Henry Hoover housemate.

So there are positives some slipway Here. I really don't finger like I've been missing some since switching from Nvidia's software to AMD's software, beyond the automatic play back function in around games, soh I'm vocation this one a sleeper—before I end up disbursal 4,000 lyric nailing down the pros and cons of both.

Both Nvidia and AMD also offer support for up-to-date APIs and game dev tools, so that's bad neat.

Decisions, decisions. Advantageously, no, I think over we get a clear master here, and I'm sure you took one look at those graphs and came to the same conclusion. The Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 is the better purchase. We're suckers for PC performance above all other here at PC Gamer, and it's the card that delivers the most bang for your buck at its intended price.

That's not to diminish what the Radeon RX 6700 XT offers for the right price and, most importantly, if you can mystify one anything close to MSRP. It's still a superb card with one of the second-best architectures AMD's delivered in past memory. It's cracking, it's just pipped to the post aside the more performant Nvidia option. At least they're close enough that you could easily prefer for the AMD card without buyer's compunction should you have good reason to.

(Image citation: Future)

AMD RX 6700 XT vs. Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Te

Just wanted to drop in a belittled mention of how the RX 6700 XT fares versus the cheaper RTX 3060 Ti.

At $399, you'd expect the card to fall quite a bit behind the Radeon RX 6700 XT, a $479 card, but IT tends to stick within azygous digits of the pricier Radeon. Sol if you're inquisitive whether you should skitter some off your build elsewhere and put information technology towards the RX 6700 Crosstalk, that decision is probably not loss to net you the biggest gains. You'd be better away saving for the RTX 3070 in that case or making sure you're building a more balanced, well-rounded PC build with the cheaper card.

Jacob earned his first byline writing for his own tech blog from his hometown in Wales in 2017. From there, he graduated to professionally break things at PCGamesN, where atomic number 2 would later gain ground command of the kit closet A ironware editor. Nowadays, as sr. hardware editor at PC Gamer, he spends his days reporting connected the latest developments in the technology and gaming diligence. When he's not writing about GPUs and CPUs, you'll find him trying to get on equally far away from the modern worldwide as possible away wild encampment.

Source: https://www.pcgamer.com/amd-radeon-rx-6700-xt-vs-nvidia-geforce-rtx-3070/

Posted by: christieplethell.blogspot.com

Share this post